Women’s right that feminists don’t talk about

When people talk about women’s rights they usually omit the most important thing – the definition of a right.

What does it mean that someone exercises a right?

It means they can do something they want.

Hence, the right is the ability to do something that the right owner wants.

Now let’s assume that one of the things that most (not all) women want is a healthy long-term relationship. For some women, this is the single most important area of their lives, around which everything (incl. career) revolves.

We can say that women should have a right to a long-term relationship.

In order for women to exercise that right, there must be enough heterosexual men in the society who

  1. want and
  2. can

build a family.

The society can influence the supply of such men through, among others, propaganda and legislation. Rational men respond to both when deciding whether or not they want to start a relationship.

The more sane, healthy men decide to not marry, the less chance for women to exercise their right to long-term relationship.

Hence, any society that wants the majority of women to be happy, must also take care of men.

The inherent, incorrigible racism of Westerners

Some time ago I decided I want to fix my issues with laziness during writing. I had this acquaintance whom I’ve known for seven years. A very successful, very smart guy. Speaks five languages according to his own statements. Runs his own recruiting agency. As a side-business he works as a shrink.

Most of the shrinks are useless. Education, experience, and certificates are not a guarantee that you will get anything useful out of a conversation.

But if the shrink is a sane, wise human being, talking with him can heal you (even if he does not have a particular certificate or education).

So I went to him. I wanted to get ideas on how I can be less lazy in when writing my book.

“Franz, what is your book about?” He said.

“It’s about the role of the Americans during and after World War II,” I said.

“But Franz…”

He shut the window.

“Downstairs is the police station.” He said. “I don’t want them to hear us.”

He sat down.

“It’s not the Americans who are guilty in all of this, but the Jews.” He started.

We continued to talk for about 4 hours. I sometimes managed to bring the conversation closer to my original goal – becoming more productive in writing. This had nothing to do with Jews. It was about me, my laptop, and the chair. No other people are involved in the process.

But he always managed to turn the conversation back to the Jews.

“Most people are wrong!” He said. “It weren’t six millions, but only two!”

He referred to the estimates of the number of Holocaust victims.

I did not respond like I should. Unfortunately, I haven’t punched him in the face. The turn from the very secular issue of personal productivity to Holocaust was too surprising to me.

I am a slow thinker, and it took me some days to understand how racist this former friend of me is.

The number of 6 million victims is racist. The number of 2 million victims is racist.

This particular Holocaust denier and 99% of other Westerners are off by an order of magnitude.

When they talk about the victims of crimes their ancestors perpetrated, they only take into account the lives of European Jews.

The real number of victims must be at least

  1. 8.7+18 million dead and
  2. 5.7 million captured.

These are the estimates of people, military and civilian, killed on the Eastern Front by the Westerners (Austrians, Germans, and their collaborators, incl. the British).

Neither Austrian scumbags, nor their American counterparts talk about these casualties. The Nazis with the Swastika had their Nuremberg laws. The Nazis with “stars and stripes” banner don’t publish their racial laws openly.

But both regard some nationalities as sub-human and worthy of annihilation. The Nazis with the Swastika thought like that about, among others, Russians and Jews. The Americans are different in that they don’t publicly declare Jews as the root of all evil. They shifted the role of the scapegoat nation from the Jews to the Russians.

Mainstream media brainwashes the population to believe these myths. Vast majority of, almost all Westerners believe in them. That’s why almost all Westerners are incorrigibly racist.

You too?

Ronald Reagan on taxation

The government’s view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases:

If it moves, tax it.

If it keeps moving, regulate it.

And if it stops moving, subsidize it.

Ronald Reagan

John B. McLemore on the efficiency of government officials

These motherfuckers would have five guys to jack their damn dick off.

One to put the condom on, and one to rub the Vaseline on, and four more to file the fucking papers, and the environmentalist would clean up the damn contamination and analyze all the byproducts, and declare the jack-off site to be a superfund place.

S-Town podcast

What people are willing to die for, according to Joseph Goebbels

It is not necessary, Goebbels wrote, that this idea is written down in a thick book. To the contrary, it must contain “only a very succinct and popularly comprehensible topic” and then anticipate a prophetic show:

“You will never find millions of people willing to sacrifice their lives for an economic program. But one day, millions of people will be ready to die for the Gospel.”

Continue reading What people are willing to die for, according to Joseph Goebbels

John B. McLemore on the state of the nation

We ain’t nothun’ but a nation of god damn chickenshit, horseshit, tattletale, pissy-ass, whiny, fat, flabby, out-of-shape facebook-lookun’, damn twerk-fest, peekin’ out the windas an’ slippin’ around listenin’ on the cell phone an’ spyin in the peep hole an’ peepin in the crack o’ the god damn door an’ listenin’ in the fuckun’ sheetrock.

Mr Putin pleeease, show some fuckun’ mercy. I mean c’mon, drop the fuckun’ bomb, won’t choo?

(Sigh) I gotta have me some tea.

S Town, Chapter V – 47:53